⚡ 12 angry men social psychology. 12 Angry Men Psychology. 2022-11-15 (2023)

12 Angry Men is a classic film that depicts the deliberation process of a jury as they decide the fate of a young man accused of murder. The film provides a rich portrayal of social psychology, as it demonstrates the ways in which group dynamics, decision-making, and individual biases can influence the outcome of a group process.

One of the key themes of the film is the influence of group dynamics on decision-making. As the jurors begin their deliberation, they are initially divided, with 11 of them convinced of the defendant's guilt and one, Juror 8, holding out for reasonable doubt. Despite being in the minority, Juror 8 is able to persuade the other jurors to reconsider their positions through his use of logical argument and his willingness to challenge the assumptions of the group. This demonstrates the power of minority influence, as a small group can have a significant impact on the decisions of a larger group if they are able to present a well-reasoned and persuasive argument.

Another key theme of the film is the influence of individual biases on decision-making. Each of the jurors brings their own personal experiences and biases to the table, which shapes their initial perceptions of the case. For example, Juror 3 is prone to anger and aggression, which makes him more likely to believe in the defendant's guilt. Similarly, Juror 8 has a background in law and is more inclined to consider the legal principles of the case. As the deliberation progresses, the jurors are forced to confront and examine their own biases, which helps them to arrive at a more objective decision.

Overall, 12 Angry Men is a powerful depiction of social psychology in action. It illustrates the ways in which group dynamics and individual biases can influence the decision-making process, and how these factors can ultimately shape the outcome of a group's decision. The film serves as a reminder of the importance of open-mindedness and critical thinking in group situations, and the need to carefully consider all perspectives before arriving at a conclusion.

Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film 12 Angry Men

There was one gentleman, juror number 8 that took a critical thinking approach to the case. Twelve Angry Men: Comparing The Book And Film 726 Words 3 Pages Many people, if asked what they would prefer, would prefer to read the book instead of watching the movie. We soon learn that several of the men voted guilty since the boy had a rough background not because of the facts they were presented with. . The different emotions shown by the jurors hinderstheir perspective and judgements on the case as well as towards the testimonies from the witnesses taken during the trial.

12 angry men social psychology Essay Example

If wrong, then it could almost permanently lead to similar decisions in the future. In the half century that has passed since TAM's premiere, many things about jury service have changed. This film features a group of jurors who have to decide if an accused murderer is guilty or innocent. The strength of juror similarities to the defendant is seen as one man completely changes his vote once he realizes how much he has in common with the defendant. Bases on criminal justice usually the first vote is taken by secret ballot.

12 Angry Men Psychology Analysis

Juror 8 portrayed himself as a charismatic and high self-confident architect. And here we see the first importance of 8: because of his reasonable doubt the jury hadn't found the boy guilty at the first 10 minutes of their debating, which would have ended the trial. The final juror, number 3, is the last to change his vote after considering assaulting Juror 8 with the murder weapon! Eleven out twelve jurors find the boy guilty as charged; however Juror 8 refuses to convict this young boy because he believes there is reasonable drought. The case involves a young boy who has been accused of murdering his father. Heuristic 1: The first heuristic I found was when the father and the son were arguing before the murder, which showed that the kid had motive.

12 Angry Men Psychology

Jury deliberations -- how do reasoning skills interplay with decision-making? The "unusual-looking knife" submitted as evidence in the Exploration of Intra-Psychic Processes Thompson and Nadler 2000 put forth a In conflict, bias is apt to occur because conflict often leads to inadequate communication between the negotiating parties; arousal of emotional tensions that constrict thinking to According to Thompson and Nadler 2000 , there are four particularly common kinds of bias, and each holds the potential for certain related effects. Overall, 12 Angry Men is a great portrayal of aspects of social psychology and could be studied much more with many other social processes. When the other jurors bring up evidence that oppose his beliefs he discards it and sticks to his opinion even though it overrules it. Shortly after this, he changes his vote to not guilty, since he sees his own struggles in the boy at this point. A teenage boy stands accused of killing his father and the jury must decide his guilt or innocence.

12 Angry Men & Social Psychology

However, there were a few people who looked around first, then they too put their hand up to vote guilty. Peer is a force that can bring out the best and worst of humanity. While this dissenting juror maintained independence and ultimately influenced the majority, this is not typically the… 12 Angry Men a Review of Dysfunctional Teams The classic movie, 12 Angry Men, was first filmed in 1957 starring Henry Fonda, Lee J. Juror 2 stated, "Well, anyway, I think he was guilty" 6. Inside of the locked room, they argued for hours on end to come to a conclusion. All the other jurors went around and stated why they thought the kid was guilty.

12 Angry Men PSY

His attitude reflects his dissatisfaction with jury duty interfering with his plans, but he projects his negativity onto the boy on trial. In the movie you can recognize several concepts covered by Kinicki and Kreitner in their book Organizational Dynamics and Human Behavior second edition. Many times these incidents can be explained using social psychology theories. At first, when the jurors each go around the table and say why they think the boy is guilty, most of them bring up the eyewitnesses testimonies. In 1990, this act was updated and reformed as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which itself was reformed in 1997.

Social Psychology Applied to the Law 12 Angry Men (the movie Flashcards

Prejudice takes centre stage in the film with jurors 3 and 10 being the most prejudiced. There were biases in attribution. The power of normative and informational social influences is shown through theories developed by Solomon Asch and Muzafer Sherif. Standing Up To The Majority In 12 Angry Men 1191 Words 5 Pages The play 12 Angry Men is about a jury of twelve men that are given the task of deciding the fate, guilty or not guilty, of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Persuasion: There were many instances of persuasion throughout the movie, but especially in the beginning. In contrast, Juror 2 is new to the juror and hence very happy and excited about the case. One of the better-known theories on Cognitive Development is, however, that which was developed by Piaget, known as the 'Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory'.

Social Psychology In The Film 12 Angry Men

The reader finally sees that his anger at the defendant is probably related to his own damaged relationship with his son. Some also say that they prefer to leave the descriptions of things in the book up to their imagination. Recently I was required to view this film and had at first great reservations about its value as an educational tool, but soon after the opening credits rolled by and the deliberations began to take place I was caught up in the story. Juror 1 Foreman is probably the least antagonistic of the group, but he does enjoy the idea of being in a position of authority. While he does not specifically antagonize the others, his votes are initially based on impatience rather than thought. The life of this young man is on the line and the jurors determine whether he will live or die.

Social Psychology in the Film 12 Angry Men

The young man also has a history of getting into trouble. It is up to Juror 8 Henry Fonda, to convince the other members of the jury to go back through and revisit the evidence. They associate all lower class people with crime, disobedience, and violence. Despite-or perhaps because of-this personal experience, TAM has become something of an archetype for jury service in America. New York, NY: W.